---
title: "What Directive (EU) 2019/904 says about single-use plastics"
description: "Directive (EU) 2019/904 regulates single-use plastic products through bans, design requirements, separate collection targets and information duties, with waste prevention as the priority."
category: stiai-ca
slug: directiva-2019-904-plastic-unica-folosinta
date: 2026-10-27
---

Directive (EU) 2019/904 is the European act that regulates single-use plastic products. It
combines bans on certain categories, design requirements, separate collection targets and
consumer information duties. Its logic is hierarchical: preventing waste takes priority over
recycling it.

## What the directive is

Directive (EU) 2019/904 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reduction of the
impact of certain plastic products on the environment (CELEX 32019L0904) is also known as the
"SUP directive", after the English phrase *single-use plastics*.

Being a directive rather than a regulation, it does not apply directly: it sets objectives and
deadlines, and each Member State transposes them into its own law. Differences in application
between states are therefore normal and expected.

The directive combines several types of measure, with distinct regimes:

- **market placement bans** for certain product categories, where accessible alternatives exist;
- **design requirements** for beverage containers;
- **separate collection targets** for plastic beverage containers;
- **recycled content requirements** for certain containers;
- **information duties** towards the consumer and product marking obligations;
- **extended producer responsibility** — the costs of collection and clean-up fall, in part, on
  those who place the products on the market.

## Beverage containers

For plastic beverage containers, the directive sets requirements on caps remaining attached to the
container — hence the caps that stay fixed to the bottle, now part of everyday practice —
alongside separate collection targets and recycled content requirements.

The regulatory direction is therefore twofold: on one side, reducing the loss of small components
into the environment; on the other, raising the rate at which the material is recovered.

## The waste hierarchy: why prevention comes before recycling

The general logic of the act is hierarchical, and the order is not an aesthetic preference but one
established in European waste law: prevention of generation takes priority over preparation for
re-use, which takes priority over recycling, which takes priority over other forms of recovery
and, last, over disposal.

For a consumer or for a facility operator, the practical consequence is simple: reducing the
number of containers put into circulation comes before, in order of preference, treating them
after use. A container that was never produced needs neither collecting, nor recycling, nor
transporting.

Recycling remains necessary, but it is the third option in order, not the first.

## What this means for a high-traffic space

In a gym or an office, drinking water from single-use containers generates a constant stream of
waste. That stream also has a logistical component, not only an environmental one: the containers
have to be brought in, stored, collected and removed.

An alternative based on reusable containers and a fixed serving point reduces that stream at the
source, not at the end of the chain.

The arithmetic is direct and anyone can check it. Someone who drinks water at three sessions a
week, from a single-use bottle each time, uses roughly **150 containers in a year** (3 × 50
weeks). A reusable container replaces that number, subject to proper care — regular washing and
replacement when it deteriorates.

For a gym with 200 active members on the same frequency pattern, the order of magnitude is around
30,000 containers a year. That figure is an arithmetic estimate based on an assumed frequency,
not a measurement; a real measurement needs the specific data of the location.

## Marking and consumer information

The directive also introduces marking obligations for certain product categories, intended to
inform the consumer about the presence of plastic and about correct disposal. The reasoning is
that part of plastic pollution comes from incorrect disposal, not only from the volume produced.

For operators communicating publicly on this subject, the relevant framework also includes
Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, whose Article 7
prohibits misleading information. An environmental claim must therefore be as verifiable as a
nutritional one.

## What this article does not claim

The article describes the regulatory framework and a simple consumption arithmetic. It makes no
claims about health effects of any type of water or container, and it does not compare water
quality across sources.

For the health claims framework applicable to water, see the article on
[the only authorised claim in the EU](/en/stiai-ca/mentiunea-de-sanatate-autorizata-pentru-apa/).

## Key points

- Directive (EU) 2019/904 is transposed by each Member State; application differs.
- Its measures range from bans to extended producer responsibility.
- Waste prevention takes priority over recycling, in the order set by European law.
- A consumer with three sessions a week uses around 150 containers a year.
- Arithmetic estimates do not replace a measurement at the location.

## Sources

- Directive (EU) 2019/904 on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment — EUR-Lex, CELEX 32019L0904
- Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 on the provision of food information to consumers — EUR-Lex, CELEX 32011R1169

---

Source: https://unikatflow.com/en/stiai-ca/directiva-2019-904-plastic-unica-folosinta/